Take more panels without lowering your standard.
The orthopedic record analysis platform for med-legal review. Every operative note, every imaging study by modality and date, and every pre-injury finding is extracted, placed in order, and cited to the page. The opinion stays yours; the assembly work doesn't.
The evaluator still reads the full record and owns the opinion. ChartInsight removes the assembly and citation work around it.
- What it does
- Orthopedic record analysis. It extracts operative history, imaging by modality and date, PT episodes, earlier versus later pathology, MMI and work-restriction entries, and documented WPI findings. Every entry is cited to its source page.
- Who it's for
- Orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and PM&R physicians doing QME and AME panels, defense-side IMEs, and records-only peer review or utilization review. Spine QME included.
- How it processes records
- OCR reads scanned, digital, and photocopied pages, including handwritten notes. Duplicate progress notes are collapsed into one entry. Every entry points back to its page in the source PDF, which is never altered.
- Security
- HIPAA-compliant. SOC 2 Type II. AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit. No training on customer data.
Capture what matters for orthopedic med-legal review.
ChartInsight extracts the orthopedic chronology and structures the evidence an evaluator reaches for. Operative history, imaging studies, PT episodes, and prior-dated records are organized and cited before you open the record.
The same record work, three ways.
Panel evaluations, defense-side IMEs, and records-only review all demand the same command of the record and the same page-level citations. The evidence layer is the same in each.
ChartInsight organizes the documented evidence relevant to diagnosis, causation, apportionment, MMI/P&S, work restrictions, and impairment from the full file, with page citations behind every entry. The opinions are yours.
Prior QME, AME, and treating reports sit in the same timeline as the treatment record. They are dated and cited, so you can see changes over time and check one account against another.
High-volume records-only work where treatment history, imaging, and PT episodes have to be located quickly and cited exactly. It is not a substitute for a physical evaluation.
An MRI is not just another note.
Imaging lands in the chronology in date order. Each entry summarizes the study, names the provider, and cites its source page, so the earlier lumbar MRI sits in the same timeline as the post-injury one instead of six volumes away.
From records to defensible packet in three steps.
Upload the full file
Drag in the PDFs as they came to you, at any size and in any condition. Every page is processed, not a sample. Processing runs in the cloud, so you can work other cases while it finishes.
Review with citations
Open the record; the chronology, operative history, imaging timeline, and medications are ready. Every entry is one click from its page in the built-in viewer.
Export a packet-ready file
Editable DOCX or PDF, with page-anchored citations preserved. Or ask a follow-up question about the record in Research Assistant.
The findings are already in the file. Getting all of them out is the hard part.
We compared 433 processed records against the expert human summaries written for the same charts. Reading the same pages, the index surfaced 1,318 clinician-documented findings the summaries did not mention, including exam signs, imaging results, procedures, and prescriptions. Of those findings, 113 were procedures, including surgeries, injections, nerve blocks, and electrodiagnostic studies. The summaries were good. Long records simply hide things on page 412. You still read the record; you read it knowing what is in it.
Semantic review of 433 processed records, each compared against its expert human Medical Summary. Synonyms counted as present; negated, hypothetical, and contradicted items excluded. Full methodology in the 433-record study.
What we hear most.
If your question isn't here, ask in your demo. We'd rather over-explain than under-promise.
PHI handled the way reviewers expect.
No model training on customer data. HIPAA-compliant program operated by Gemini Legal. Records isolated to your account, encrypted at rest and in transit. Active attestations available on request.
Run an orthopedic QME, AME, or IME through ChartInsight.
Upload the file and get operative history, imaging in date order, PT episodes, and earlier-dated records held in the same timeline as the records that follow the claimed injury. Every entry source-linked and audit-ready.